How free were slave's really in the North? Really try and define free, to be free is the right to act without restraints. You define yourself as a free individual while you still are governed by a government, you have restrictions but still have the Bill of Rights and a Constitution to protect you word and define yourself as an individual in your community. Blacks in the North which mostly consisted of children of ex-slaves, ex-slaves and slaves freed by their masters were "free". This was a restricted life though, discriminated with harsh prejudice, and treated as less than a person, and given not rights but privileges. They did have specific political, economic, social, and religiuos freedoms.
Blacks political freedoms were very restricted the 1860's. In all of the states except for Maine blacks were allowed to vote in New England (Doc A). More than half of the mid-west restricted Male suffrage. Massachusetts had the best attitude towards blacks though, they were the only state to allow suffrage of Black Males and allow them Jury Duty (Doc A). In New York though, it was mandatory for a $250 property requirement to be able to vote, for example in 1855 out of 11,000 blacks only 100 could vote (Doc A). However African American Females still had no right to suffrage or jury rights.
Charles Mackay very bluntly described his view on Blacks in the North as he spoke for his race, "we" the white men(Doc B).For he clearly stated the Economic Freedoms of Blacks. "We" will tolerate the black man, that the white men "shall not buy him, or sell him" but they will tolerate the black man as someone not even worth to associate with (Doc B) They will permit his existence to continue. He can pay his taxes and perform duties. However he is to "inferior to their presence he may not be permitted to dine with them, marry their daughters, to attend social events, concert, party's, and chorales. He is of "another race". To find a job to support their existence even proved just as hard. Even of as the same educational degree as a white man a black man was of no equal, for what job could he receive when no white man would want to work beside him? (Doc C).
In 1819 a young African American in first of his class stated how he felt about the prejudice against his race, of his Social Freedoms(Doc C). For how could he achieve a career when because of his color, no one would employ him, for know white man would work beside him. Just as Charles Mackay said, white people would not want any black sort of "inferior" "race" associating with them (Doc B).
Blacks did have religious freedoms which was probably their most liberated privilege.The church was a way of coming together in a spiritual and social way to connect to each other while they could freely share their thought on their religion and connect more in the community's social causes and to fight for their rights and to rally against abolition, suffrage and even printed their own newspaper(Doc D). They AfricanCongregational Church in New Haven even offered a literary club! (Doc D).
Blacks in the North may have had their rights but they were small and without those political, economic, social, and religious freedoms right's, blacks had, they would be even father away from "freedom". Blacks in my opinion were not free enough. A free slave should have been counted as, as equally as a white man and their color should not restrict them from education social or economic rights that white men had.